Error, consistency and triviality

In this paper, we present a new semantic challenge to the moral error theory. Its first component calls upon theorists deliver deontic semantics that is consistent with error-theoretic denial of truths by returning truth-value false all sentences. We call ‘consistency challenge’ second demands explain in which way assertions can be seen differ meaning despite necessarily sharing same intension. ‘triviality Error either meet consistency or triviality challenge, argue, but are hard pressed both.